<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Be a Musical Scientist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegoodmusician.com/2007/11/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegoodmusician.com/2007/11/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/</link>
	<description>Be a successful musician, one note at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:04:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Tuesday Blogroll ControlRoom - Mixin&#8217; it with Dr. J</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodmusician.com/2007/11/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Tuesday Blogroll ControlRoom - Mixin&#8217; it with Dr. J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodmusician.com/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] 9.  The Good Musician tells us why Music Theory is the best. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9.  The Good Musician tells us why Music Theory is the best. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. J</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodmusician.com/2007/11/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodmusician.com/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Music transcends its notation just as good literature is more than the alphabet.  The problem with most theory instruction is the focus on the trees, not the forest.  It&#039;s something I wrestle with everyday;  making a lot of dry, fundamental concepts and definitions point to a higher understanding and valuing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Music transcends its notation just as good literature is more than the alphabet.  The problem with most theory instruction is the focus on the trees, not the forest.  It&#8217;s something I wrestle with everyday;  making a lot of dry, fundamental concepts and definitions point to a higher understanding and valuing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun Muralidharan</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodmusician.com/2007/11/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun Muralidharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodmusician.com/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Absolutely right. Musical science is an important component of a musician, but it&#039;s just a module of a perfect system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely right. Musical science is an important component of a musician, but it&#8217;s just a module of a perfect system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rewsnat</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodmusician.com/2007/11/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>rewsnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodmusician.com/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Science will help you improve and develop art. But true art still comes from the heart. Science is only a tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science will help you improve and develop art. But true art still comes from the heart. Science is only a tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rewsnat</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoodmusician.com/2007/11/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>rewsnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoodmusician.com/how-to-be-a-musical-scientist/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Being a musical scientist is good, but never forget to put your true passion into every piece you play. 
Too often have I seen classical pianists focusing so much on finger dexterity but not knowing what artistic value the piece was trying to convey.
Too often also have I seen jazz pianists executing killer jazzy licks that doesn&#039;t suit the whole context of their solo improvisation lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a musical scientist is good, but never forget to put your true passion into every piece you play.<br />
Too often have I seen classical pianists focusing so much on finger dexterity but not knowing what artistic value the piece was trying to convey.<br />
Too often also have I seen jazz pianists executing killer jazzy licks that doesn&#8217;t suit the whole context of their solo improvisation lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>